Wolves: Romain Saiss says ‘goodbye’ to fans

Wolves centre-back Romain Saiss was ‘waving goodbye’ to supporters after his team’s Premier League clash against Norwich City at the weekend, according to journalist Tim Spiers.

The Lowdown: Wolves draw with Norwich

It has been a disappointing end to the season for Bruno Lage’s side, who bowed out at Molineux for another campaign with a 1-1 draw against the relegated Canaries on Sunday afternoon.

It means that Wolves’ European dream is over for another year but the players still got a nice reception from the crowd as they showed their appreciation after the final whistle.

It was a moment to gauge the body language of some, in order to see if it looked as though they were saying their farewells in the Black Country.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/all-the-latest-from-wolves-6/” title=”All the latest from Wolves!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=“none”]

The Latest: Spiers reckons Saiss was ‘waving goodbye’

That certainly appeared to be the case with Saiss, with Spiers taking to Twitter to claim that the Moroccan may have played at Molineux for the last time as he shared a clip of the Wolves players acknowledging the fans in a post-match lap of honour.

The journalist tweeted: “Saiss at the end there. Waving goodbye you’d have to say.”

[freshpress-poll id=“388780″]

The Verdict: Great servant for Wolves

It makes sense for Saiss to move on at this point, with his contract expiring next month. At 32, it would seem that his best days are no longer in front of him.

He should be remembered as a brilliant servant for Wolves, though, with the Moroccan making 206 appearances for the club, scoring 15 goals for good measure and standing out as one of their best performers this term.

It is now a case of replacing Saiss, who has been such a reliable and regular part of the defence for a number of years, to ensure that Lage’s side remain as defensively savvy next season as they were for the bulk of 2021/22.

In other news, Spiers has also lamented the decline of one Wolves player. Find out who it is here.

Tentative footwork a sign of Bangladesh's scrambled minds

Time after time, the batsmen were rooted to the crease against India’s fast bowlers

Mohammad Isam in Kolkata24-Nov-2019The handful of times Bangladesh made India was when their batsmen broke out of their shell.Early in the Kolkata Test, Shadman Islam furiously square-cut and pulled Umesh Yadav, and immediately Virat Kohli put the man back on the square-leg fence. Whenever Mushfiqur Rahim drove the ball firmly, even the might of the Indian pace attack had second thoughts about pitching it up to him.On the second evening at the Eden Gardens, when India were threatening to end the game, Mushfiqur and Mahmudullah’s short-lived counterattack brought balance into the contest. It was a reminder that even the greatest bowling attacks can be dealt with if you have clarity of mind.Mushfiqur, who finished as the team’s highest run-getter in the two Tests, didn’t look to dominate, but his approach usually impresses on any opposition the value of his wicket. He had only one early dismissal in the four innings, but would still rue missing out on a bigger score in the second innings in Kolkata. He had a measure of India’s bowling, and more importantly the pink ball.Mushfiqur Rahim made a valiant half-century•BCCIGiven their struggle to put up good scores, there was a lot of focus on Bangladesh’s decision to bat first in Kolkata. But coach Russell Domingo and captain Mominul Haque had the right intention of pushing for a win rather than waiting for the opposition to hand them the opportunity. Their plan only fell apart because of the rest of the team’s tentativeness.Imrul Kayes, who made only 21 runs from 61 balls all series, was the epitome of this mentality. Whether he was defending or hitting out, he looked totally short of confidence, resulting in dismissals to whatever type of bowling he faced. The gap between his bat and pad was that of a batsman who has regressed despite playing more than ten years of international cricket.Shadman, his opening partner, did a little better but the round-the-wicket angle and relentless accuracy of India’s fast bowlers got to him too. The left-hander’s dismissals had a lot to do with his lack of footwork, which was also evident in New Zealand earlier this year where he kept getting out after settling down at the crease. When a batsman is rooted to the crease, it lets the fast bowler corner him with his line and length.Mahmudullah is roughed up by a rip roaring bouncer•BCCIMominul had judgment issues outside off stump. In Kolkata, he was caught behind both times when neither delivery seemed to be heading towards his off stump. The same problem cost him a chance to build on his only substantial knock of the series, in Indore, when he was bowled after leaving an R Ashwin delivery. Mominul is an established Test batsman who has had a few dips in his career, so improvement is expected.Mohammad Mithun, considered to be the right man to bat as high as No 4 in the Test line-up, has work to do as well. The 28-year old owns the Bangladeshi record for most first-class matches before a Test debut, which translates to a technique that is already etched into his system. It might be hard to shake him off some bad habits now, like his bat coming down at an angle against a really good bowler. He is essentially a strokeplayer who has made a career out of quickfire knocks that unsettle bowling line-ups. Perhaps the intention was to ruffle the feathers in the Indian ranks but Mithun, who made only 37 runs in four innings, isn’t quite ready for that role yet.Liton Das is another batsman who is known for his strokeplay, but he continues to be inconsistent, starting off really well but losing focus after hitting a handful of boundaries. It has been a problem that has plagued many a Bangladeshi batsman, with only Tamim Iqbal getting out of this mindset halfway into his career. Liton is known to be a recluse who doesn’t spend a lot of time talking to coaches, and his temperament and mentality could do with a rethink.Liton Das nudges the ball into a gap•AFPAnd what of Mahmudullah? It may be hard to drop him now in the continued absence of Shakib Al Hasan, but his performance indicated the difficulty of one batsman shouldering so many important roles. Mahmudullah is an ODI enforcer and a T20 finisher. It might be too much to ask him to be the team’s backbone in Test cricket as well. It is time for change of approach and the only way that will work is with input from both player and the team management.All these batsmen, barring Mushfiqur and Mahmudullah for a brief period on the second evening in Kolkata, being rooted at the crease came at a huge cost. Perhaps their hanging back had a lot to do with their apprehension about this Indian fast-bowling attack. Half the battle is won in the mind, as many experts say, and most of the Bangladesh batsmen entered the Indore and Kolkata Tests with a preconceived notion that they were about to become lambs to the slaughter. Half the battle was lost right there.

Andre Russell, MVP

A look at what lies behind the rise of the West Indian allrounder who just might be the world’s hottest T20 property at the moment

Nagraj Gollapudi30-Apr-2016On November 13 last year, West Indies allrounder Andre Russell was playing his first match of the Ram Slam T20 Challenge. In the fourth over, South Africa and Titans batsman Quinton de Kock flicked Knights fast bowler Malusi Siboto high over mid-on, where Russell was fielding.It was never going to be a catch. Not even in Russell’s mind when he saw the ball fly off the bat as he walked in (“briskly,” he says) to save the single.”After the ball went over my head I heard ‘Two, two, two,'” Russell recounted when he spoke to ESPNcricinfo this February in Dubai, where he played in the Pakistan Super League for eventual champions Islamabad United.”They [batsmen] never thought I will get there. As soon as I heard that, I said, ‘I am going to the drop-in zone as soon as possible.’ So I turn and I sprint. I just muscle down the field, focusing on getting to the ball. I look up, I realise I am close to the ball. I make two or three more power strides, stick my hand out, the ball just fell right on the tips of my fingers. As soon as I feel the ball, I push my hand out and I make sure I have it covered because I know I was going to fall. I did not want the ball to bounce out of my fingers.”Here’s a clip of the catch.As the commentators gushed, Russell quickly stood up and folded his arms in front of his chest, as if to ask himself and the crowd: “Would you believe that?”Russell has made pulling off stunning feats on the field his trademark. With the bat in hand he has engineered spectacular finishes in T20 leagues around the world, in which he is highly sought after. The IPL, the Big Bash, the PSL, the CPL, Ram Slam, Friends Life T20 – he’s a marquee player in all of them. In 2015, his first proper year in the IPL, Russell finished as the Most Valuable Player in the tournament, when he played in every match for his side, Kolkata Knight Riders.”You have to give credit to the hard work you put in,” he says. “I believe now that nothing comes easy. I can achieve a lot more from just working harder and make sure that whenever I cross the ropes, I can do well. I know my job is not easy. I have to bat, bowl and field, run from long-on to long-off. But I am always in the game. So it was good to get the MVP.”Progress has been swift for Russell over the last three years. From a player with potential, he has become a must-have asset. In the IPL, he was largely an unknown in his first two seasons, during which he played just seven matches for Delhi Daredevils. At the 2014 auction, Knight Riders were looking for an allrounder who could eventually take over the role performed by their senior player at the time, Jacques Kallis.Russell, who had gone unsold in the first round, had a base price of Rs 60 lakh (approximately US$100,000 then), and Venky Mysore, the Knight Riders chief executive, ended up buying him for that sum.During an interval in the auction, an official from a rival franchise walked up to Mysore and commented on the Russell buy: “Good luck managing him,” he said. Mysore, though, has had no cause for regret. “He has been one of the most fantastic guys in the dressing room,” he says of Russell. “He is absolutely one of the best allrounders going in this format. We also felt with his batting skills he could move up and down the order.”In his first season at Knight Riders, Russell only played two matches, where he managed one wicket and two runs. A few months later, in the Champions League T20, he was to the fore in the thriller against Chennai Super Kings in Hyderabad. Chasing 158 to win, Knight Riders were sinking at 51 for 5 after eight overs when Russell joined Ryan ten Doeschate, the Essex allrounder, at the crease. The two turned the match on its head with a swift 80-run partnership that included a 22-ball 50 from Russell. His eventual 58 included five sixes and four boundaries, at a strike rate of 232.

“I was always singing to the girls in the classroom, knocking on the desk, making beats among friends. I always liked to do music, but I just didn’t trust my voice [enough to] say that it is going to happen and people are going to support me”

Russell had arrived. “He won the game for us from an impossible situation,” Mysore says.He recounts another incident, from the last IPL. “I told him before a game [at the Brabourne Stadium in Mumbai], the straight boundaries are shorter but the side boundaries seem quite long. He said, ‘No ground is too big for me, maan.'””You can’t buy experience,” Russell says. “You have to earn experience and live it. The first two years I played IPL, I was with Delhi, and I play, like, seven games in two years. It is not like I could not do what I am doing now, but I was not getting a chance. If I was getting a chance with Delhi, I would maybe be a better player now because I would have learned more – how to deal with failure, how to deal with success.”So at that time, not getting enough chances, I just know that, all right, I am happy to be part of the team. I learn how to be a team man and support the team and make sure that each guy that is in the playing XI is comfortable. I am on the bench, run up with water, whatever.At Knight Riders, Russell found himself at home, at peace. “I was in the zone that I want to be in. I know, even if I fail, I am going to play the next game. That is the kind of trust – if players get it more often, you will maybe see a lot of spectacular things from the player.”Mysore had no second thoughts about holding on to Russell. “Tell me how many are there who can give you all three with match-winning ability, particularly with the bat?” he asks. “With the bat, Andre Russell is a type of player – I think any opposition will fear that he can turn the game from any stage because it is a matter of a few hits with his power and his capability and his skill.”

****

Many gifted athletes are good at more than one sport before they focus on one. Russell was an ace at football, where he started as a forward before switching to defensive midfield. Once, when his team did not have a goalkeeper, he volunteered to stand in.”We were losing games because easy goals were being scored. I said to the coach, ‘I can keep.’ He said, ‘No, who is going to play in the field? You have to play and score goals.’ If you start to keep, we have no one to score, so we are going to draw. I said, ‘We must, and can, score at least one goal per game, and I will make sure no one scores against us.’ So I started goalkeeping from there.”Russell got a scholarship to play football at Clarendon College. They had a good team and he did not get enough game time. Hungry to play, he approached the coaches, who asked him to bide his time.One day, after football season, he tagged along with a friend who played cricket for the school’s senior team. “Me and two other guys were playing our own little game on the side, with a little, soft ball.”I was hitting the ball all over the place, bowling fast. The coach was watching me. I didn’t know that. He called me and asked me my name. Then he asked why I don’t come and play cricket. I said, ‘But those guys bowlin’ fast and I am scared.'”Russell was about 13 or 14. He told the coach he would try but he would take it slowly. He played Under-14s for the first year and then moved to the U-16s. By the end of the first year at that level, he was playing for the senior team as a wicketkeeper.”There was no specialist wicketkeeper in the squad. The first game we played, we had a keeper who let 38-40 byes go, and I remember that as I was bowling! So I tell the coach that I am going to keep. He was fine. I watched [Adam] Gilchrist and few other keepers that I liked, to see how they kept, catch a ball with style and the right technique.””I know my job is not easy. I have to bat, bowl and field, run from long-on to long-off. But I am always in the game”•BCCIKirk Harris, who played U-15 cricket for Jamaica “saved” Russell by relieving him of the gloveman’s duties, which allowed him to move his focus back to fast bowling.Many were surprised he could bowl. “The year before Harris came, I went to a Jamaica U-19 preparation camp and I went as a keeper. The second year, I went as a fast bowler. The trainer was setting up some cones. He knew me as a keeper previously. He said to me, “Russ, go and get your keeping stuff. We are going to stay on this base and catch the ball.” I said, no, no, showing him my bowling boots. I told him, ‘I am a bowler now.’ I surprised everyone.”He focused on running before going to school and for a half hour after school, doing lots of weights, working out in the gym – all to bowl as fast as he could. Eventually he made it into the Jamaica U-19 side. He also continued to be goalkeeper for Bowlers FC.When he was 17, Russell was asked to attend a Jamaica U-20 camp by the president of the local football federation. Around this time he also received a fax from the Jamaica Cricket Association asking him to play for the U-19s for a second year.A week later he received a message from the Jamaica Football Federation saying he was in the 30-member squad for the Jamaica U-20s. When it came to making a choice between the sports, he told the school’s principal that he wanted to play cricket.The football officials continued to call, and failing to reach him, they rang his grandmother. “She said, sorry, he wants to play cricket,” Russell remembers. “I had to tell them I was already in the Jamaica U-19 camp. I had to tell them something. That was where everything started.”He started cutting everything else out of his life, focusing on cricket – and singing. “I was always singing to the girls in the classroom, knocking on the desk, making beats among friends. I always liked to do music, but I just didn’t trust my voice [enough to] say that it is going to happen and people are going to support me.”Having played in front of packed stadiums around the world, that has changed. “It is like nothing for me now to go on the stage and perform,” he says.Coaches who have worked with Russell describe him as fearless in attitude, outlook and play. Vijay Dahiya, assistant coach with Knight Riders till 2015, recollects the away match in Pune against Kings XI Punjab last year where Knight Riders’ top order failed.Russell walked in at 60 for 5 after eight overs. Less then ten overs later, his side had stormed to a domineering victory with 13 deliveries to spare. Russell blasted 66 runs from 36 balls at a strike rate of 183. At the time he called the innings the best one of his life.”You give him any situation, he is willing to do it – be it with bat, ball or while fielding,” Dahiya says. “You give him the support and the confidence and he will take it seriously, he will go out and try and do it every time. He is a positive influence to have around in the change room.”

“With the bat, Andre Russell is a type of player – I think any opposition will fear that he can turn the game from any stage because it is a matter of a few hits with his power and his capability and his skill”Venky Mysore, KKR chief executive

“You have to be fearless, maan,” Russell says when told about Dahiya’s praise.He then talks about his hair. “If I am going to do something to my hair, I know it is going to be on TV, it is going to be the centre of attraction. You have to prepare for that. You have to know that if I should put my hair in blond colour, what are they going to say. But you are going to have fans out there that are going to give it to you straight. I don’t mind that.”In February, Russell said he would be unveiling a new hairdo at the World T20. And sure enough, he sported one that featured a flame-coloured streak running over the top of his head.The desire to make a statement extends to his footwear. Russell is often seen wearing mismatched shoes, with Dre Russ inscribed on them. “I know the attention is going to be on them. It is fun, especially when you are doing well. You can have a fancy haircut, you have something about you that is different. If you are not scoring runs, people are going to think you are worse. But if you are taking wickets and you are scoring runs, everyone is going to cut their hair like you or wear different shoes like you.”

****

For all the adulation he has received in the world of global T20, Russell has been questioned about his commitment and contributions to West Indies cricket.”I’m so disappointed with the media, I’m not doing no more interviews. They always put words in your mouth. #imdone.”Russell put out that message on his personal Twitter account in December, reacting to a news report in Australian media that quoted him as saying in an interview: “My household needs wouldn’t be fulfilled just by playing in the West Indies team.”Russell, who was playing for Sydney Thunder in the Big Bash while West Indies were losing in the Test series in Australia, said his words were misinterpreted.”I give them my opinion. I let them know that I feel sorry for the guys [in the national team in Australia], knowing that I can actually see them trying, but Australia is in top form at the moment – they recently beat New Zealand badly.”But this guy said to me, ‘Why are you not playing? You should be playing with your pace, your bowling….’ He was like a fan in the stands.”I said to him, ‘Sir, first of all, you can’t compare my bowling now in a T20 game to a Test match. A Test match goes on for five days. When I bowl one over now [in T20], I get a break and I come back four or five overs later. I am fresh again. Then I don’t bowl till the 15th, 18th, 20th over. After that I just bat. I go back to the hotel, ice up and I’m good.”A Test match, you are talking about almost 20 overs per day. My knees and my body, whenever I tried playing first-class cricket back home, I can’t complete a game without coming off the field, icing somewhere, getting pain, taking injections, pills. I can’t play a full game without doing all of those things.””I have to be selfish to look after myself, and whenever West Indies have T20 and ODI games, I am ready and I can go there and I can do my best”•IDI/Getty ImagesRussell said if he was fit he would “surely be bowling 145-plus” for West Indies in Tests.”What should I do? Stay home? I still want to play cricket. I play with a lot of pain here and there.”Russell says he put a message out on Twitter and Instagram because he wanted to make clear the respect he has for West Indies cricket. “West Indies is who made me the player that I am now. I had to start from somewhere. I started from Jamaica, moved to West Indies and now I am playing everywhere,” he says.His Test career is one match old. He turned 28 yesterday. His knee perpetually gives him trouble. Does he expect to turn out for West Indies in whites again?”At the moment the hopes of me playing Test cricket is very slim. I have been to the States, India, local guys in Trinidad and Jamaica. I have seen doctors that have worked with basketball players, NFL players. They said that a lot of power athletes come with similar type of knee injuries,” he says.Russell says he puts stress on his knees with his penchant for twisting and turning at high speed while chasing the ball in the field. Unlike other fielders who first turn, build up momentum and then run fast, he “can just turn, boom. So the pressure that my knees undergo by just starting off so briskly is big. I have tendinitis.” An operation will not solve the problem permanently, not to mention that it would also rule him out of action for at least six months.Russell says he let Clive Lloyd, the West Indies chairman of selectors, his panel members and Richard Pybus, the West Indies director of cricket, know all this about a year and a half ago.In January 2015, while delivering a lecture in Cape Town, Lloyd had this to say about Russell: “I spoke to him only a month ago and said, you can get into our Test side because you are one of the best allrounders in the world. A couple of weeks later he told me he has got a bad knee and could only play one-dayers. It’s such a waste that we have a guy who could be a great cricketer, who is now not thinking of playing both formats. We have contracts, probably not as exorbitant as others, but they are getting good money. It doesn’t seem playing for our country is paramount where these players are concerned.”Russell says he was deeply hurt when he read Lloyd’s comments. “I feel like someone give me a hard slap and run and I can’t catch them to hit them back. It is not like I don’t want to play for West Indies. A lot of times I get a contract to play cricket wherever and I turn it down to play one-day and T20 cricket for West Indies.”The selectors want Russell to play all three formats, but his reasoning is: the longer he stays fit, the longer he can play for West Indies in the shorter formats. “I have to be selfish to look after myself, and whenever West Indies have T20 and ODI games, I am ready and I can go there and I can do my best,” he says.Like many of his team-mates who are up in arms against the board, Russell too thinks the way WICB has dealt with its players is “not fair”.

“You can have a fancy haircut. If you are not scoring runs, people are going to think you are worse. But if you are taking wickets and you are scoring runs, everyone is going to cut their hair like you”

He finds some of decisions made by people who used to play the game “shocking”, but does not name anyone in particular. “They know it is a tough sport. Our career is not a long career.”You can still work when you are 60, 70. You are going to gather more knowledge about how you go about your job as you grow older. But when we are 35, you are looking to say I am going to pack up. You can go to 42 now in cricket. But when you are 44, you are going to play a few Masters [type tournaments]. That’s all.”At the moment I wouldn’t give up a WICB contract to go and play elsewhere. I don’t have a contract. I did last year. I played most of the games when I was under contract. Still, I did not get a retainer contract. No one say a thing to me.”Russell says he has had to find doctors himself, and spend his own money travelling abroad to get his knee sorted. “So after me getting back fit, you think it’s fair to give someone your service that actually didn’t care about you when you were down and out?”He says he is now bowling at full throttle. “I used to bowl 135-137kph, I am bowling 145-150 now. Doing the necessary work, strengthen myself, get fit again, spend a lot of money doing things to make sure I am good to go. But as I said, I won’t turn my back on West Indies cricket. I will always be available to play.”Does he think he is the best allrounder going around in limited- overs cricket? “Yeah, of course,” Russell says. No arrogance or bluster there, he just believes he is.Before going into the World T20, he said it was embarrassing his highest score was 24, and said he wanted to play the role of a “game changer” in the tournament. “I want to make sure that when I walk out there I am doing whatever it takes to have my personal best in T20Is. To make sure whenever it is coming, it is a game-winning score.”On March 31, against India in the semi-final, Russell recorded his highest T20I score – 43 not out – to help knock out the hosts.He has no doubt that allrounders trump specialists when it comes to T20. “You need to have specialists, but if you can have a guy like myself, Bravo, Pollard, Jadeja, Mitch Marsh, Watson, that can bowl, field, and come and change the game for you with the bat, not necessarily hit big sixes but bat properly and get the job done, I think you can actually win any tournament once you have men like that.”Paddy Upton, coach at Sydney Thunder during their BBL title-winning campaign earlier this season, thinks Russell is the “most complete athlete” he has come across. “He demands huge output from his body. He gives 100% effort in batting, bowling and fielding, with an attitude of total commitment,” Upton says. “One of his challenges will be to maintain his body to be able to meet the demands he places on it, and that the various tournaments around the world will ask of him.”As he further develops his understanding of how to bat on different surfaces, and against different bowlers, so he will become even of an all-round match-winner. And more of a menace to his opponents.”

Another controversial run out

Plays of the Day from the Group A match between England and Bangladesh in Adelaide

George Dobell09-Mar-2015Turning pointIf England were to get close to their target, it was always likely that Ian Bell would have to contribute a major portion of the runs. He seemed to be on course, too, as he complied an untroubled half-century. But Rubel Hossain, generating good pace, produced one that was on to Bell quicker than he anticipated. His attempted square drive instead became a thin edge to the keeper. Bangladesh were elated, England were shell-shocked and they never really regained their equilibrium.Nail in the coffinThe decision to give Chris Jordan run out probably ended any lingering hopes England may have had. Jordan had over-committed to a run that was never there, but seemed to have regained his ground with a dive that beat Shakib Al Hasan’s throw. But replays showed that Jordan’s bat had bounced as it hit the ground and, while it was well past the line, partially in the air. It took the TV umpire, Simon Fry, an age to decide. Whether you agree with him or not might depend on whether you were siding with England or Bangladesh.Decision of the dayEngland’s decision to bowl after winning the toss may well have proved costly. While the logic – that there might be some moisture in the pitch after rain in the morning – was reasonable, it also meant they were guaranteed to chase under pressure. For a side that was low on confidence and knew that their World Cup future was at stake, it was an odd risk.Shot of the dayThere was not much wrong with the delivery. But, such was Mahmudullah’s form and confidence, that the full ball from Stuart Broad was driven, on the up, over extra cover for four with tremendous power. Taking a step back to give himself room, it was a stroke that bore the hallmark of real class.Boundary of the dayIn other circumstances, Mahmudullah’s stroke off Chris Woakes – a bludgeoned shot which saw the batsman skip down the pitch and pull through midwicket – might have presented an easy catch. But here, with a 54-metre boundary towards the west side of the ground, the shot carried for six despite traveling no more than 54 metres and a few centimetres. Sometimes the battle between bat and ball looks unequal.Run-out of the dayPerhaps, had Moeen Ali batted for 20 overs or so, England would have made such inroads into their target that their nerves would have eased. Instead, Moeen ran himself out in the eighth over of their reply as he pushed the ball to mid-on and skipped halfway down the pitch. Perhaps Ian Bell was guilty of ball watching, perhaps Moeen just presumed that Soumya Sarkar would not gather cleanly. Either way, by the time Moeen realised and turned to attempt to regain his ground, Sarkar had unleashed an accurate throw and Mushfiqur Rahim did the rest.Reward of the dayIt took only four deliveries for England to gain reward for a more aggressive approach. Whereas in recent matches they have tended to start with two slips, here they began with three and soon increased the number to four. James Anderson, bowling at a much sharper pace than he has in recent games, benefited in the first over when Imrul Kayes was surprised by the extra bounce and edged to third slip where Jordan, winning a recall in place of Steven Finn partly due to his superior fielding, claimed a smart catch.Mistake of the dayJust for a moment, the crowd thought that Mushfiqur’s marvellous innings had been ended on 78 as he thrashed a full toss from Woakes to long-on. They had not noticed the umpire’s call of no ball, however, as Woakes had over-stepped. It might well have been a no ball on the basis of being over waist height, too.Throw of the dayIt had seemed for some time that none of England’s bowlers would defeat Mahmudullah. Eventually, after becoming the first Bangladesh batsman to make a World Cup century, he was defeated by a direct hit from short third man. Reacting to Mushfiqur’s call for a sharp single – Mushfiqur had cut the ball late behind square – Mahmudullah responded quickly, but was defeated by Woakes’ direct hit.

An English plan made in Australia

Something that David Saker had seen in Chris Rogers’ batting led to a wicket and an on-pitch tribute from England’s leading bowler

Jarrod Kimber13-Jul-2013James Anderson wasn’t looking at his captain. James Anderson wasn’t looking at the catcher. And James Anderson wasn’t even looking at Graeme Swann in the seconds after his Chris Rogers wicket.Anderson was looking at someone though. He was pointing. He was screaming. He was connecting with a special person on the balcony. It was passionate and romantic. But instead of a beautiful woman wearing a white gown leaning seductively on the balcony, it was the round, flushed face of David Saker.Saker didn’t blow a kiss at Anderson; he just gave him the thumbs up.Only lip readers will know, or at least think they know, what Anderson said to his beloved coach. Anyone who didn’t believe in cricket coaches might have been converted by this dramatic moment. Saker is certainly of more use to Anderson than merely driving him to and from the ground.This all came about, like the best crime films, with a plan.The plan was not all that complicated. Anderson would bowl around the wicket to Rogers. He would pitch it up on off stump. There would be a short midwicket. And Rogers would eventually flick one in the air to the short midwicket.It could have been something Saker had seen in this innings. Or it could have been something Saker remembered from a Shield match against Rogers in 1999. It’s even possible that Rogers showed the weakness to chipping in the air when Saker was Victoria’s assistant coach.Saker coached Peter Siddle and James Pattinson before leaving Australia for the England job. He was under Cricket Australia’s nose for over five years. Victoria’s fast-bowling line up was scary, and Saker was getting credit. In any of the many recent overhauls Saker could have been tempted back home to finish the job he started at Victoria.Instead he plots the downfall of his countryman and gets screaming adulation of the opposition.It wasn’t just any wicket either; this flaccid flick from Rogers was what has given England their chance to win. With Rogers at the crease, Australia had one end locked tight. Rogers had dulled Graeme Swann. Australia had moved past 100. Michael Clarke was still with him. There were reasons to be optimistic. Hell, there were reasons to tease random English people that their 10-0 prediction may not last until lunch on Sunday, if you’re that kind of fan.And it wasn’t as if a James Anderson late-hooping million-dollar ball took him out. The ball couldn’t have been any straighter if it were a Southern Baptist Preacher. It wasn’t particularly quick, maybe the slightest bit of pace off. It played no tricks off the pitch. Had there not been the yellin’ and screamin’ at Saker on the balcony, it would’ve looked like a lucky wicket.Maybe it was. But England seemed to get a lot of lucky wickets. They continually aimed at Shane Watson’s massive front pad until they hit it. They gave Ed Cowan a part-time spinner to hit out of the rough knowing that he might be more likely to have a go off Joe Root than Swann. They kept the ball in the place Clarke is most likely to play a half shot and nick behind.But until tea, England were ordinary. They were flat. Steven Finn was hidden. Swann looked out of sorts. Anderson was manageable. And Broad looked more pantomime villain than cold-blooded assassin. They were playing like a side who thought 311 runs were way too many for Australia, even though the evidence was proving otherwise.According to Ian Bell, the break came at the right time. Sitting his bowlers down, the man with the round face and Australian accent gave them new plans.After tea Australia lost four wickets. They had to use their Ashton Agar. They only scored 63 runs in 34.2 overs. They lost all advantages. And referrals. They were naked.Saker and Anderson had made them so. The coach, his ‘most skillful bowler in the world’ and their simple plan.

Morkel's misfortune, and an exchange lost in translation

ESPNcricinfo presents the Plays of the Day from the third day of the second Test between South Africa and Sri Lanka at Durban

Firdose Moonda28-Dec-2011Misfortune of the day
Morne Morkel should have had a wicket with his fourth ball of the morning when he induced Kumar Sangakkara to drive. A healthy outside edge found its way to Graeme Smith at first slip who waited for Mark Boucher to dive to his right and attempt to grasp it from out of his range. The result was the two senior men looking at each other in horror as the ball went between them. Morkel was distraught and Sangakkara went on to score a fluent 108, which could well take the match out of South Africa’s hands.Shot of the day
Sangakkara made the most of his lifeline and played a series of sublime strokes, none more majestic than the upper cut off Marchant de Lange. He tried to butter Sangakkara up with a few short balls but then offered him too much width. Sangakkara accepted by stepping onto his tippy toes, arching his back and slapping the ball over the slip caudon, who could only watch and admire.Breakthrough of the day
Sri Lanka went about their business of building a sizeable lead in fairly quiet fashion. Sangakkara and Thilan Samaraweera had put on 94 runs together and both looked in control when Imran Tahir ended their stand. He slipped in a slider, which deceived Samaraweera – usually a confident and competent player of spin – and snuck off the inside edge onto his stumps. Tahir’s manic charge around the field that normally follows a wicket became a more subdued run towards Mark Boucher as short-lived relief passed through the South African camp. Words of the day
When Sri Lanka’s lead crossed the 400 mark and South Africa’s weary attack looked no closer to taking a wicket, one would have thought they would have had nothing to say. But Dale Steyn had something to get off his chest and he let Dinesh Chandimal know in the same over the young wicketkeeper had taken a boundary off him courtesy of AB de Villiers’ overthrows. Steyn bowled a few short balls and gave Chandimal a verbal working over. It turns out it may all have been wasted because Chandimal doesn’t speak much English.

Insouciant and insane

The ball may have gone for six, it may have gone to hand – King Kris cared not a bit

Ruchir Joshi25-Nov-2008

The mad Tamilian opener who seemed to enjoy facing Andy Roberts and Joel Garner, in action in the 1983 World Cup final© Getty Images
At lunch on the third day of the Karachi Test in January 2006, with India two down and staring down the barrel, I sent off a text message to some Indian and Pakistani friends: “Forty-two runs in nine overs. I don’t see a problem, do you?” [India were chasing 607 in the fourth innings]Though Sachin Tendulkar and VVS Laxman were still batting, to imply not only that India would save the match – not such an outlandish possibility – but actually scoot up the vertical mountain-face and win it, was the equivalent of the grinning refusal of the blindfold before the firing squad. It was facetious, but only just so. Had the score at that point been 42 for 0, with Rahul Dravid playing bass to Virender Sehwag’s heavy lead guitar, even Pakistani supporters might have been a tad tense if not quite sending out their own pre-seppuku one-liners.I can trace being able to think like this at all to the doings of one man: Krishnamachari Srikkanth. It wasn’t as if there hadn’t been hard hitters before Srikkanth, even in the ranks of Indian batsmen, most of whom swore by the God called “Along the Ground”. MAK Pataudi had re-introduced to Indian batting the heretical art of deliberately lofting the ball; Farokh Engineer was always busy and burly; Brijesh Patel, Sandeep Patil, and the Palmolive , Kapil Dev, were all known to be able to hit a ball pretty hard; even SM Gavaskar (the most parsimonious of them all, especially with wasteful energy) had a square-cut with which you wanted to avoid anything close and personal. Outside India, you had thick-shouldered Pakistanis, beefy Englishmen and beefier Aussies, all of whom could send the ball a long way pretty damn quickly.And then you had those other guys. The other guys comprised a team in which a man called Gordon Greenidge was not the hardest hitter of the cricket ball, or even the second-hardest – that was Clive Lloyd – but the third. By the time I started paying attention to cricket after a five-year hiatus (things such as America and girls having obscured my true calling, which was to sit endlessly before a green-screened TV set) I had only heard of this demon called Viv Richards and how he had brought great fast bowlers to the point of tears. The moment I turned my attentions properly back to cricket was when this Richards fellow hit a high ball at Lord’s, and this Kapil Dev fellow sprinted around to pull off a pretty impossible catch. Among other things, the catch then allowed Kapil to replace the ball in his hands with the World Cup.I watched many replays of that final from the safe shore of victory, and it was then that I began paying attention to the “other things” that contributed to victory. One of them was this mad Tamilian opener who seemed to enjoy facing Andy Roberts and Joel Garner in a cauldron divided between roaring Afro-Caribs and . As I followed him on TV, I saw that he also found Australian quicks quite tasty, and Imran Khan and Mudassar Nazar downright yummy, whether on Australian tracks or a first-hour Eden pitch.With Srikkanth there was no sense that this was anything but a very enjoyable game he was playing; that, if it bored him, he was capable of turning from the stumps and just keeping on walking, past the square-leg umpire, past the boundary and out of the groundAs an Indian fan, watching King Kris gave me an exhilaration no batsman had before and few have since. I don’t remember statistics and I don’t even want to dwell on specific matches. What I still hold precious is the sheer, violent poetry of the moment KS hit the ball. The stance was one of the widest in world cricket: almost like a slip fielder standing with pads on, and holding, for some odd reason, a bat in his hand. The movement could be minimal or those feet could blur; he had footwork to go with the eye-hand, but he often didn’t need it. The bat did what for the time were very strange things: slashes, jabs, exhibition swordplay; a lot of the time it was kris-kross, but then it would suddenly become straight, scything down two cover fielders long-distance or turning long on into L-O-N-D-O-N statue!After the ball – hit, miss, or near-dismissal – the ritual would always be a long walk away from the stumps towards square leg, as if that was his invisible home base, just as the bowler’s is the starting marker. He would return to the crease, never with reluctance but always with the air that he was there only momentarily, to dispatch the silly distraction of a delivery before walking away again to whatever was really occupying him.With Srikkanth it is the memory of an attitude, a certain taste of confidence in the mouth, that stays. Of course, he got out in some terrible dismissals – first over with nothing on the board, or just when he looked like taking the team through to a sure win – but the chief trace he left behind for me was that of an unstoppable, cheerfully whirring energy turbine of optimism. No matter what the situation, at the start of the bowler’s run-up there was no question who this man backed – the bowler, unless he got very lucky, was basically . In this, King Kris was the first of a kind for India, but, simultaneously, in another sense, he was perhaps the last of a kind as well.When Tendulkar arrived, he came heavily mediated not only by television but also by advertising – the guy has been a ham actor for almost as long as he has been a great batsman, and when you see him you see all of that attaching itself to him, the Shahrukhs, the Pepsi bottles; tied to his back is the monster radial-belted tyre of his extra-cricketing persona. When you see Tendulkar, or Sehwag, you see a two-legged industry that also happens to bat beautifully. With Srikkanth there was no sense that this was anything but a very enjoyable game he was playing; that, if it bored him, he was capable of turning from the stumps and just keeping on walking, past the square-leg umpire, past the boundary and out of the ground. Even in those days it was not something you saw very often. As for now and the future, I doubt we’ll ever see that spirit again.

'Prepare your family' – Ian Wright reveals advice over racism after revealing he would still take a knee if playing today

Ian Wright has weighed in on the Lionesses' decision to no longer take the knee before matches, expressing that, had he still been an active player, he would consider continuing the act as a personal symbol of standing against racism. The former England and Arsenal striker emphasised that taking the knee should always have been an individual choice rather than a mandated team action.

  • Jess Carter suffered racial abuse
  • Received severe online hate
  • Lionesses will not take knee anymore
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    Wright’s remarks came in light of recent events surrounding England defender Jess Carter, who became the target of racist abuse following her performance in the Lionesses' UEFA Women’s Euro 2025 quarter-final win over Sweden. The player disclosed that she had faced a surge of racist attacks on social media after the match and has since made the decision to step away from online platforms temporarily.

  • Advertisement

  • Getty Images Sport

    THE BIGGER PICTURE

    In response to the abuse suffered by Carter and broader discussions within the squad, the England women's team confirmed they would no longer perform the symbolic kneel before games. The players released a collective statement, declaring that it was "clear we and football need to find another way to tackle racism." They stressed their intent to adopt a new approach, one that fosters genuine dialogue and actionable change.

  • WHAT WRIGHT SAID

    Ahead of England's semi-final win over Italy, Wright returned to ITV’s pundit panel and addressed the significance of the knee and how it had evolved since first gaining prominence in football after the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement in 2020.

    "Firstly I think the decision to take the knee should have been a person thing, if you want to take it," Wright said. "I think it was always forced on people, for me, if I was playing now, for everything the knee represents, if we think of justice and equality of everything that goes with it, I think I would still take the knee.

    "But in respects of Jess, the priority is she is ok and has the support around her but for me, I have said everything I can over the years in terms of racism and what it means and what it does and nothing gets any better. What I would say now is prepare your children, prepare your family, make them resilient because it is going to continue to come. People say that is negative, it isn't they are winning and have been winning and will continue to win, I would urge people to build resilience against it. We can't stop it, it is always going to happen."

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images Sport

    WHAT NEXT FOR ENGLAND?

    As Wright and others continue to advocate for awareness, respect, and resilience, the hope remains that football will evolve beyond symbolic gestures and toward real, lasting transformation. Meanwhile, Sarina Wiegman's troops are just a step away from successfully defending their Euro 2022 crown after they beat Italy 2-1 in the last four. They will now face the winners of Spain and Germany on Sunday at St. Jakob-Park.

Khawaja covers for Thunder's fumbles

Despite another creaky performance that highlighted the weaknesses in their side, Usman Khawaja just about proved the difference against Perth Scorchers

Jarrod Kimber11-Jan-2018Last season, Sydney Thunder won three games in the Big Bash League. They finished last, with the worst net run rate as well.The games they won included one featuring a staggering fifth-wicket partnership of 84 between Pat Cummins and Eoin Morgan, sealed off the last ball. In another, Fawad Ahmed took 4 for 14. Their third win was a good effort from the bowlers, and then James Vince breaking the chase in the Powerplay.Cummins hasn’t played yet this year, Morgan doesn’t have a contract, and Vince has been busy with England (and now seems to have caught Joe Root’s gastro). Two seasons back they won the whole thing. Mike Hussey and Jacques Kallis played, Andre Russell in his pomp and Usman Khawaja was so good David Warner got demoted from the Australia opening position.The Thunder were great, and then they were horrible. And then there is this year.It’s hard to work out how this current team wins. Their seam bowling is almost always ordinary, they don’t get off to fast starts, they routinely manufacture their No. 6, and you could make a pretty solid case that last season Cummins was their best batsman.In this game, they played the best team in the competition; but the best team in the competition without the Marshes, Nathan Coulter-Nile, Jhye Richardson, Andrew Tye, and Jason Behrendorff.Coming in, the Thunder had won two games from six.The problems for the Thunder start right at the top. Kurtis Patterson, their opener, made a hundred on his Shield debut at 18. He’s a talented player. But he’s not been a good T20 player. In 24 matches, he has made no fifties. He faces 15 balls per game, but strikes at 110, so on average he’ll produce 16 runs. It gets worse: Patterson scores a boundary every 6.4 balls in the Powerplay, the average is 5.4. Not only is that 17% worse than the average, with all but two players outside the circle he doesn’t even hit a boundary per over.In 11 out of 17 innings of over 10 balls, he has scored slower than his team, despite coming in during the Powerplay virtually all the time. He’s outscored when he is at the crease by his team-mates, and he faces more balls in the Powerplay than the man at the other end. So he doesn’t hit boundaries or rotate the strike well, he doesn’t make fast runs, or go on for big scores.

Their overseas signing hasn’t been going well, their allrounder captain isn’t bowling, and their long-term seamer is a one-dimensional player

Coming in at No. 4 is Callum Ferguson, who hasn’t made a fifty in his last 28 BBL innings. He strikes at 120, and his average is 22.58. But Ferguson can play, he averaged over 40 in ODIs, and he’s the sort of batsman when in who ups the rate well. You cannot afford to play both of them, and if you do, Ferguson has to bat higher up the order than he currently does.Their depth outside the squad is also a problem. Aiden Blizzard is a quality player, but he’s getting on. Ryan Gibson has had a shocker of a year (30 runs in five hits). So when Vince is healthy, and with the Thunder hoping Khawaja doesn’t get called up as injury cover for the ODI side, they will most probably drop Patterson or Ferguson.But their batting problems don’t end with these two and the depth. At No. 6 they’re batting Arjun Nair. Every time he comes out to bat the commentators talk about how he hits the ball to unusual places; well, he has now hit 303 runs in his 25 professional games across all formats. So at the moment, he rarely hits the ball anywhere. The problem was there last year, when Cummins batted six, but Cummins made it work. This year Nair has 49 runs at a strike rate of 119.51, which is handy. But when you have two slower batsmen up the order who don’t make big scores, Nair either needs to make more runs, or make his runs really fast. He may get there, but he hasn’t shown that yet.Tonight, none of that mattered. Since 2012, Khawaja is averaging 72 in BBL cricket. He was excellent again, scoring at 9.96 runs an over and making almost half their score. The rest of the Thunder scored at 7.5.Other than Khawaja, the other thing holding this team together is their spin.The Thunder spinners are outstanding. Over the last two years they’ve gone at 6.84 and over, the pacers at 8.75. That isn’t because they’ve been in the soft middle overs: even when the pacers bowl those overs, the spinners are better. They are also way better in the Powerplay, going at 5.9 compared to 8 an over. And with Nair getting more confident since last year, their spinners are even better now.The problem is that while one batsman like Khawaja can often win the game for you, generally you need most of your bowlers to play well. One-off bowling performances win far less game than one-off batting. So even Fawad, who has nine wickets and at economy of 5.9 this year, can’t win many games.That means the Thunder seamers have to be better – and they have lost Russell and Cummins since last year. Coming into the Scorchers game, Gurinder Sandhu’s last five outings had him leaking over ten runs an over.Gurinder Sandhu celebrates Alex Doolan’s wicket•Getty ImagesOne thing Sandhu’s good at is bowling with the new ball. His econ is 6.8, he strikes every 19 balls, and his average is 21. That’s him ranked sixth, fifth and third for those skills in Powerplay. He bowls 38% of his overs in the Powerplay; but he doesn’t often bowl more than one over. This was the first time since 2012-13 that he bowled more than two overs in it. In that game, also against the Scorchers, he took 1 for 18. So you have a team whose seam bowlers are struggling in the Powerplay, and a bowler who gets smashed when he bowls outside the Powerplay, who doesn’t bowl enough in it.Tonight was Sandhu at his best; he swung the ball massively; he got the big wicket of Ashton Turner, and when he did come back on to bowl at the death, he did so with confidence. His over should have iced the game. But even Mitch McClenaghan – brought in to shore up their seam bowling – gets in green and becomes like all the other recent Thunder seamers: incredibly expensive. And the one player who could probably help, Shane Watson, has bowled 7.4 overs for the season.So their overseas signing hasn’t been going well, their allrounder captain isn’t bowling, and their long-term seamer is a one-dimensional player.When Fawad finished his overs, the Scorchers needed 74 from 30; they got 70 of them.It’s not like the Thunder fielded brilliantly either, this might’ve been the worst fielding of a tournament that has already been plagued by drops. In the last over they fumbled, missed a run-out, and that is not even including McClenaghan’s full-toss no-ball.Khawaja covered their flaws against this Scorcher-lite team. But as good as he was, and as much as the weakened Scorchers struggled, it still came down to the last ball. And with a boundary needed to win the game, a full toss was delivered. Luckily for them, it was mishit.The Thunder have now won three games in this year’s BBL. They won, but how.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus